Will Google’s FeedBurner Scorch Organic SEO?
By : Admin
World’s largest search Google has acquired FeedBurner for a sum of $100 million. FeedBurner is a popular RSS feed Management Company. Chicago-based FeedBurner was founded in 2003 and has raised just $10 million in capital over two rounds. The move means Google advertisers will have another, new avenue for their marketing and FeedBurner’s more than 430,000 publishers will be able to join the Google Adsense publisher network.
FeedBurner’s Web-based tools, including a feed and blog advertising network, can help publishers promote, deliver, and monetize their content on the web and make feed-based content more accessible and manageable for its end users.
There will be a number of possible implications of Google’s latest acquisition however; expectations are high that Google will take advantage of FeedBurner’s analytics and advertising capabilities.
People using Google Analytics, can look forward to the likely merger of FeedBurner’s RSS feed analytics and Google Analytics! This would centralize all Web site performance analytics into one convenient interface.
Predictions are also high that Google will also incorporate FeedBurner statistics into its organic search ranking algorithm. Let’s look at the reasons why our Google search results aren’t likely to be hampered by feed subscription counts.
Backlash Possibility – Should Google decide to incorporate RSS feed subscription count to the algorithm, there would be the inevitable backlash. Buying and selling feed subscriptions would suddenly generate millions in revenue for those attempting to secure a high ranking. The RSS subscription count would become worthless overnight. While there would still be people legitimately subscribing to feeds, the inflation would be so extreme as to ensure that search results are completely unreliable.
FeedBurner Supremacy – The second problem is one of FeedBurner supremacy. While FeedBurner may indeed be the most popular feed reporting service, many sites use Pheedo or they rely upon a simple RSS system based on a WordPress or other blog software theme. I can currently subscribe to most RSS feeds using my Firefox browser. Even if a site uses FeedBurner, I don’t have to click on the FeedBurner button to subscribe, which means that the FeedBurner counter is inaccurate. With this in mind, Google would be penalizing every site that uses Pheedo or simple RSS systems.
Static Web Sites – The third problem with relying on subscription numbers for authority is the simple truth that there are thousands of static Web sites that do not offer a single RSS feed. Too many static sites exist with no blog, no press release section, and no regularly added content. While we obviously don’t recommend static Web sites to most clients, their continued existence is inevitable. Some of the oldest sites on the Web with 11 or 12 years under their belts have no RSS feed.
While Google Blog Search results may be affected by the RSS feed count, the standard Google search won’t be able to take subscription counts into consideration unless Google decided its priceless reputation was suddenly unimportant.
No, we can continue to expect the value of the inbound link to remain. The SEO speculators will have to find another conspiracy to adopt. Google isn’t going to do anything radical to damage its popularity or preeminence in the realm of search.
Spread the word: related/bookmark it/readit
Del.icio.us
posted in SEO/Search Engine News | 0 Comments






